October 17, 2014

Carrie Comparison (1976, Horror) : Visual Literacy Analysis on Book vs. Film Comparison

Carrie (1976; Brian DePalma) is a film expressing the famous novel by Stephen King. It stars Sissy Spacek, who displays the mousey, innocent behavior of Carrietta (Carrie) White, aside her religiously wicked mother, Margaret White, played by Piper Laurie. It shows a few days in the life of Carrie through showing the misery of high school, the cruelty of juveniles, and the difficulties of beginning womanhood, while also showcasing the awkwardness, weird happenings, and backward lifestyle that are all part of who Carrie White is. This film expresses the fears that we have of people who are different that may, or may not, exist in the world.

There are several differences between the film and the book, but not big enough instances to be a completely unrelated theme between the two. The film makes Carrie out to be too scared to stand up to Momma until nearly the end, while the book has Carrie threaten her near the beginning. The rocks fall down over them at the end of the film on top of the burning house, while the book has Carrie causing the rocks to fall in anger towards Momma to destroy the home. The film has Carrie only blow up the school and kill Chris and her boyfriend in her van, while the book has her destroy the entire town, according to a rumor. They are only little differences, but they make the film carry out in a very different fashion than the book intended. However, it still conveyed the same general idea of the story line.

This is expressed many ways in the dialog that is used, or not used in certain instances. Near the beginning of the book, Carrie tells her mother these things all in one conversation: “Momma you let me go,” “I'll make the stones come again, Momma,” and “You suck!”1 There is nothing like this in the film. This is because the film tries to convey Carrie as a helpless little lamb stuck in a lion's den, while the book shows her as a girl who has a miserable life, but knows completely well what she is saying and doing when she uses telekinesis. The film makes the viewer feel more empathy for Carrie, while this is not important in the book. There are other things that are verbatim in the film from the book, such as, “I can see your dirtypillows.”2 These kinds of lines are necessary for the plot, while the aforementioned lines are more for character development than plot.

Stephen King creates visuals, majority of the time, through expressing the inner depressions and feelings of Carrie. The shower scene is a perfect example of this. King gives the visual of chaos from the girls and their actions of throwing tampons and sanitary napkins at Carrie, chanting, “Plug it up!” at the frightened girl who had started her first menstruation.3 He shows the anguish and fear of Carrie as she goes through this experience. King also shows how nervous Carrie is when she asks Tommy, her out-of-the-blue prom date, “Do you like me?” and he replies, “You're beautiful.”4 He showcases this unjustified fear of hers by having her blurt out this question on her doorstep the second she sees Tommy, meanwhile he confidently tells her the truth: that she is beautiful.

Brian DePalma, the director of the 1976 film, interprets these visuals that King created in both good and bad ways. DePalma expertly shows the shower scene verbatim to King's visual in how it is laid out and executed. Every little detail, down to the description of how Carrie is supposed to feel and how that is expressed, is exactly as King wrote. Other scenes are not quite as perfect to King's book as this one.

There is the scene where Carrie asks Tommy, “Do you like me?” In the book, she asks him this as he picks her up at her doorstep to her home before going to prom. However, the film sets this up for happening actually at the prom. Lastly, DePalma misses the mark on the ending, as far as following the original vision of Stephen King.

DePalma goes in a completely different direction with how he ended the story of Carrie White. King had Carrie and Sue have a mental conversation as Carrie got weaker, and inevitably died. The conversation really took off and sent Carrie over the edge when Sue sent the message: “Look Carrie look inside me.”5 It describes the weird feeling when Carrie opens Sue's brain and reads it like a library filled with books, and how invasive the experience is for Sue. Carrie is at her last moments before death and Sue can feel it. Once Carrie is gone, Sue feels sorrow. In the film, this is a much shorter and much different ending, probably because of time constraints. DePalma has Carrie die with her mother in her arms, murdered by her, while their house burns to the ground. This is clearly a much shorter and much different ending than what King had envisioned.

In my opinion, the film version was better than the book, with one exception. The book seemed to go on and on with the endless back and forth of the newsreels from the “now” and the story from the “then.” Every ten pages or so, there was a section entitled “ News item from the Westover (Me.) weekly Enterprise, August 19, 1966)”6 or “From The Shadow Exploded (p.129)”7 etc. It was just rather distracting and confused the story for me.

DePalma interpreted the famous King book in some instances excellently, while in others completely went in a different direction to make it better. DePalma expertly conveys King's vision for the shower scene in the very beginning. The way that he followed the words of King to the tee makes this scene full of impact and gives the impression of inner war, outer turmoil, and something truly freaky going on inside of Carrie.

An example where DePalma both did and did not accomplish what King had envisioned when writing the scene is where Carrie asks Tommy this question: “Do you like me?” This scene is full of emotion in both the book and the film. The way that DePalma interprets the “Do you like me?” scene accomplishes King's view by showcasing the true emotion that both parties feel, Carrie's fear and Tommy's budding love for her. However, it does not just by choosing a different venue for it to occur, the front of Carrie's home8 versus actually at the prom.

Lastly, DePalma just decides to go his own path in the end of the film, which really disappoints me. The end of the book was where Carrie and Sue have an entire conversation through their minds as Carrie gets weaker and eventually dies. I enjoyed this ending and really preferred it over the DePalma interpretation of the ending. DePalma had ended the movie Carrie with Carrie dies while holding onto her mother, whom she killed, as their house “burns to Hell.” This ending really just depressed me while the King's ending gave a slight glimmer of hope before dashing it to pieces.


REFERENCE:
Carrie, Stephen King. pp.3 – 290. Doubleday Dell Publishing, New York: 1974.
1Pages 69 – 70.
2Page 148.
3Pages 8 – 9.
4Page 147.
5Page 287.
6Page 3.
7Page 150.

8Page 157.

October 6, 2014

Creative DNA Questionnaire

Here's a little bit about me and my creative life:

  1. What is the first creative moment you remember? When I had to have severe surgery at age 8, I thought my life was over as an olympic swimmer in-training. I picked up a piece of paper and a pencil, then ran wherever my mind took me on that paper. I ended up drawing over 200 outfits in three days on whatever pieces of paper anyone would give me.
  2. Was anyone there to witness or appreciate it? My mom was there. She told me to go wherever I wanted to go with my life, as long as it was my passion.
  3. What is the best idea you've ever had? To create a high fashion collection from just primary colors.
  4. What made it great in your mind? It's very risky and unseen anywhere, especially in fashion.
  5. What is the dumbest idea? To go to someone else to make my costume for a cosplay one year.
  6. What made it stupid? We just saw things completely different when it came to my designs. I wasn't happy in the end and neither was she.
  7. Can you connect the dots that led you to this idea? Yes, I had the money, the design, but not the time to make it.
  8. What is your creative ambition? I want to be a high fashion / costume designer and cosplayer on the side.
  9. What are the obstacles to this ambition? One, meeting the right people at the right time. Two, the college and internships that get you to number one. Three, I'm getting married. I just hope I can juggle a family, a job, and a passion.
  10. What are the vital steps to achieving this ambition? First, to train under a master seamstress. Then, start my online design business and make it all legal. Next, roll with the punches, talk to people, meet that right person at the right time. Fourth, work hard to make it to the top. Lastly, work even harder to stay at the top.
  11. How do you begin your day? I lay in bed on Pinterest for a few minutes, before getting ready for the day.
  12. What are your habits? What patterns do you repeat? Habits, Ha! That's funny! I like to call them quirks. I leave home for school/work and pickup a Large Sweet Tea from McDonalds or a Large French Vanilla Frozen Coffee from DD then listen to my screamo music all the way to my destination.
  13. Describe your first successful creative act. Hmmm....I wrote a song back in my sophomore year in high school, called Scarred Heart. It actually got recorded, but no one ever bought it. But it was still successful to me because I took the chance on it. Risk was the real success to me.
  14. Describe your second successful creative act. My final project for Beginning Design class. We had been working on it for over a month, and she kept changing things that we had to have or not have. She was so indecisive! Ha! It, somehow, came out really amazing in the end.
  15. Compare them. These are different in many ways. One is physical art while the other is a song. But both came straight from the heart.
  16. What are your attitudes toward: money, power, praise, rivals, work, play? Money is Power. Praise creates Rivals. Work almost always leads to Play.
  17. Which artists do you admire most? Yaya Han, Pentatonix, Louie Palma, Vera Wang, and Three Days Grace.
  18. Why are they your role models? Yaya Han is a beautiful cosplayer who has somehow found a way to make money from her passion. Pentatonix can make any sounds with their voices, I am convinced of this. Louie Palma is still making music, physical art, and songs even after all that he's been through. I wanna be that strong. Vera Wang is what I wanna be: famous, rich, but still down-to-earth. Three Days Grace makes music like no one's listening.
  19. What do you & your role models have in common? We all have a passion for what we do (or in my case, want to do).
  20. Does anyone in your life regularly inspire you? Betty Franklin is not an artist in the conventional sense. When it comes to balancing life, she truly is my greatest inspiration. She is the strongest woman I know and she's so wise of just about everything.
  21. Who is you r muse? MY muse? I don't know. Life, it's risks, family, faith, etc.
  22. Define muse. Muse is someone/something that inspires you to continue and further your passion without knowing it.
  23. When confronted with superior intelligence or talent, how do you respond? I usually am awestruck and just want to be taught by whoever it is.
  24. When faced with stupidity, hostility, intransigence, laziness, or indifference in others, how do you respond? Stupidity? I feel pity. Cuz “there ain't no cure for stupid.” I don't respond to hostility well. I tend to zone out with that. Laziness is just stupid and I already gave my opinion on that. Indifference is inhumane. People must connect to survive.
  25. When faced with impending success or the threat of failure, how do you respond? Success makes me fear that a threat of failure will come, but when a threat of failure comes, I pick up my skirt and run through the storm. Nothing can stop me once I put my head to something.
  26. When at work, do you love the process or the result? I hate my jon, so no on both accounts. Now when it's creative work, I love the process AND the result. But the process is my favorite part, because what good is the result if you didn't enjoy it along the way?
  27. At what moments do you feel your reach exceeds your grasp? I'm not familiar with this concept. Things are always within grasp. You just have to find the right tools and learn how to use them.
  28. What is your ideal creative activity? Sewing, designing. For my living. I need my passion or I will just wither away to nothingness.
  29. What is your greatest fear? My God is with me. “Whom shall I fear?” (Psalm 27:1). “For God has not given us the spirit of fear, but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.” (2 Timothy 1:7)
  30. Who is the likelihood of either of the answers to the previous questions happening? I have no doubt I am going to be famous and rich for my designs. I can feel it. I am too determined to let it not happen. I will work harder all the time to get to where I want to be.
  31. Which of your answers would you most like to change? I do not regret anything in my life. But I guess the only thing I would love to change is my job, just because it is miserable.
  32. What is your idea of mastery? I think of it as having the most information or skill than the majority of people on a subject, service, or trade. But there is always room to master more on anything.
  33. What is your greatest dream? To be a good wife (and MAYBE mother, although most likely not) and run a successful business that I love and that brings glory to God.



October 5, 2014

Advertising Idea Book #5

2013 Grand Clio Award Winner: Ray-Ban, “75 Years of Legend” (Marcel Worldwide, Paris)

Source: http://www.adweek.com/news-gallery/advertising-branding/2013-clio-awards-winners-149372#grand-clio-print-2



Type of Ad: Print.

Company / Product: Ray-Ban.

What is the benefit of the product? The benefit of this product is shade from the sun's harmful UV rays and make you look cool in name-brand designer sunglasses.

Who is the ad directed at, or talking to? (Be as specific as possible) The ad is directed at the people who feel like they are rebels from society, “the hippies.” It is talking to all the young people who want to be cool, or part of something bigger than themselves.

How does the ad attract your attention (smile, laugh, informs, provokes, involves, think)? Describe how. This ad attracts my attention in that this one couple is sharing an intimate moment in the middle of societal chaos. They are the only ones in focus in the entire photo. While everyone else is running around crazy, they are cool enough to have a soft moment to themselves among the crowd. It provokes people to “never hide” who they are even among the chaos of real life.


2013 Grand Clio Award Winner: The Guardian, “Three Little Pigs” (BBH, London)

Source: http://www.adweek.com/news-gallery/advertising-branding/2013-clio-awards-winners-149372#grand-clio-film-1


Type of Ad: Film.

Company / Product: The Guardian.

What is the benefit of the product? The benefit of this product is the receiving of information in a fun, exciting way.

Who is the ad directed at, or talking to? (Be as specific as possible) The ad is directed at people who are both bored with regular news and are looking for a fun,exciting news company.

How does the ad attract your attention (smile, laugh, informs, provokes, involves, think)? Describe how. This ad attracts my attention because it makes me laugh. The three little pigs are the bad guys in this version of the classic tale. So bad that the cops come armed and ready to their house where the big bad wolf is stewing on the pot. It shows how this company can have fun while still keeping the news in real time, which is perfect for the fast paced consumers nowadays.

What is the strategy? They use dramedy (aka dramatic comedy) to show how in the minute their news is.

What is the idea/concept? The idea is that they can even have something as fun and silly as a fairytale being told in real time.


Bilnkered or Long View?” FPA of Australia

Source: http://fpa.asn.au/about-us/fpa-advertising-hq/


Type of Ad: Print with Question Headline.

Company / Product: Financial Planning Association of Australia.

What is the benefit of the product? The benefit of this service is the ability for companies to have a more secure financial balance in their business.

Who is the ad directed at, or talking to? (Be as specific as possible) The ad is directed at companies and individuals who may be facing financial struggle without being able to see the “light at the end of the tunnel.” It speaks to those who might need money help the most. These viewers may feel like they have been only given certain options and forced to wear their blinkers, when a long view would help them visualize and achieve their ultimate, long-time goals.

How does the ad attract your attention (smile, laugh, informs, provokes, involves, think)? Describe how. This ad attracts my attention because it provokes me to think of the answer to the question. Which one would I like? What do they mean by that from a financial standpoint? How can they compare finances to the windows in a car? The question is thought-provoking and so more likely to bring people to their website just for this reason.


How does it meet the criteria outlined in the chapter as being one of the acceptable types of question headlines? (Or does it not meet that criteria?) It meets the criteria in 3 ways. One, it does not as just a flat out “yes/no” question. Two, it asks what the viewers wants rather than about their experiences. Three, it is thought-provoking in adding a metaphor. By doing all of these, it is both effective in getting it's message across quickly, yet still makes people think enough to be more likely to check it out.

More Ad Analyses to Come!